Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: THEORY: accusativity marking [was Re: Viko Notes Question]

From:Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Date:Saturday, June 29, 2002, 8:05
On 27 Jun 02, at 16:41, Nik Taylor wrote:

> You don't even have to go outside of PIE. Spanish has things like "A > Juan le gustan los perros" (Juan likes dogs), where "los perros" is the > gramatical subject, and "A Juan" the gramatical (indirect) object. And > yet, strangely enough, the word order is as if _Juan_ were the subject > and _Los perros_ the object! That, to me, has always seemed the > strangest part of that construction. If it were *"Los perros le gustan > a Juan" it wouldn't be that odd, but the conflict between order and > "case" is bizarre. :-)
Wouldn't that have to be "Los perros gustan a Juan", without the "le"? As I understand it, the "le" is to mark the subject-object reversal and wouldn't be required if the order is the normal one. ObConlang: A similar construction occurs in Verdurian: if subject and object are swapped, such as for emphasis, then the accusative personal pronoun can be inserted before the noun to distinguish. This is especially handy since nominative and accusative have the same form in the most common masculine and feminine declensions. For example: Abend levatre Susana. Abend(nom) kissed Susana(acc) Susana ilat levatre Abend. Susana(acc) her(acc) kissed Abend(nom) and Ihano levatre Rahela. Ihano(nom) kissed Raheli(acc) Rahela [ilat] levatre Ihano. Raheli(acc) [her(acc)](optional) kissed Ihano(nom) In the second case, the "ilat" is optional since the nominative and accusative forms are different (Ihano/Ihanam, Raheli/Rahela). The pronoun is also optional for first and second person subjects: Levatru Susana. I-kissed Susana(acc). Susana [ilat] levatru. Susana(acc) [her(acc)] I-kissed. since "Susana" cannot be the subject of "levatru", with its first- person singular ending. (This reversal is sometimes used in situations where other languages might use the passive voice, which Verdurian lacks as a morphological form.) Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <Philip.Newton@...>

Reply

Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>