Re: The Language Code
From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 22, 2003, 23:03 |
Hi!
Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> writes:
> n number
> s singular
> d dual
> t trial
> p plural
> f paucal ("just a Few things")
> a distributive ("things All over the place")
> g collective ("things Grouped together")
> ...
Hmm, isn't that distributive vs. collective, i.e., a different
category than mere number? Or am I wrong there? I thought e.g. the
English numbers are all distributive and to get a collective meaning,
you either use a different word (like 'cattle') or use
'herd'/'flock'/'swarm'/'group'. But maybe I got that wrong.
My current conlang research project (*grin*) has nullar, singular,
dual, trial, plural, paucal and 'any-number' (the default without
morpheme is 'unspecified number'). By default, they are all
distributive(?), but they can be applied more than once, making all
but the last one collective:
cat.PLURAL = (several) cats
cat.PLURAL.DUAL = two (groups/sets/...) of (several) cats
The 'any-number' makes collectives without constraining the number,
so:
cat.PLURAL.ANY = (groups/group) of (several) cats
By the way, I don't know the following terms in the syntax|arg
category:
> >> h hierarchical
What's that?
> >> t topic/focus
What's that? (I know what topic and focus are, but how can they be
used for argument structure?)
**Henrik
Replies