Re: Sign Languages (was My new treasure)
From: | jogloran <exponent@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 25, 2002, 2:25 |
Er.. yeah, in the name of information, I posted a correction to my
claim in another message which was probably ignored. They're deaf and
mute, I think.
<<
laokou <laokou@M...> wrote:
From: "jogloran"
> >I had no *idea*
> > Rikchiks
> > were deaf;
> Wait. No, I lie. They're mute, not deaf, methinks. Oops.
Well, the website I was led to said the Rikchiks have "no sense of
hearing",
which by many definitions means "deaf". (That sounds more sarcastic
than I
intend).
Kou
>>