Re: Whee! 1000 Words! (=D
From: | Robert 'Neo' Hill <neovirus@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 15, 2002, 18:14 |
On Monday 15 July 2002 10:08 pm, you wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim May" <butsuri@...>
> To: <CONLANG@...>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Whee! 1000 Words! (=D
>
> > Joe writes:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Christian Thalmann" <cinga@...>
> > > To: <CONLANG@...>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 8:40 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Whee! 1000 Words! (=D
> > >
> > > > Two replies in one...
> > > >
> > > > --- In conlang@y..., "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@Q...> wrote:
> > > > > Congrats. You must be proud of yourself. :-)
> > > >
> > > > I do have some pride for Obrenje, but the credit is not all mine,
> > > > the language has evolved quite independently on the "genome" that
> > > > I gave it. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > > Ahh, Ebisedian is still in its infancy. It's currently only about
>
> 220
>
> > > > > words strong, although it has a grammar detailed enough to make
> > > > > one cringe.
> > > >
> > > > LOL, I know the feeling. Obrenje is rather benign in terms of
> > > > grammar, but the grammar was already at a functional level of
> > > > completeness when the vocab was still around a hundred words. =P
> > >
> > > Well, Zitwbata has 162 words, and it's fairly complete in terms of
>
> grammar.
>
> > > I know this because I succesfully translated a text from Illaini with
>
> little
>
> > > to no trouble.
> >
> > This all seems natural enough to me. How can you decide what words
> > will be necessary until you know how they'll be used?
>
> Sorry, I don't get you? Qhat do you mean?
I think he means its natural to have a complete grammer, else you do not know
what meanings you need to scribe to words :)