Re: OT: Origin of names (WAS: Re: Proto-Uralic?)
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Sunday, June 29, 2003, 17:33 |
Christophe Grandsire wrote at 2003-06-29 14:29:07 (+0200)
> En réponse à Joe :
[...]
>
> > It would open up a whole new a-posteriori Conlanging field.
> >And what would be even weirder is if we had another species as
> >intelligent as us sitting right under our noses, and we never
> >realised it.
>
> Actually, it's been quite a while that we know that. The only
> problem is that the people telling about the impressive
> intelligence of dolphins were not taken seriously. After all, there
> just *couldn't* be another intelligent species on Earth but us
> (also, for long people have considered that intelligence had to do
> with the ability to create and use tools, something that by
> definition dolphins cannot do - difficult without hands -).
>
"We" don't "know that" at all, Christophe. Some researchers in that
field have reached such a conclusion, but many others disagree. It is
possible that they are simply blinded by prejudice, but I see no
reason to assume that to be the case.
Here are a couple of pages I've found on the subject of cetacean
intelligence and communication - I cannot vouch for their accuracy,
but they seem balanced to my inexpert eye.
http://dolphins.org/Learn/lmm-dcmm.htm
http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Myths/br-be-an.htm
Replies