Re: Finno-Ugric
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 12, 2001, 15:59 |
Tero Vilkesalo wrote:
> I've seen the term 'Fenno-Ugric' being used. Which one is right?
"Fenno-" is technically the correct Latinate combining form.
However, "Finno-" is a very common variant. Finno-Ugric
is only a part of Uralic, which has two branches,
Finno-Ugric and Samoyedic.
> If the
> Fenno-Ugric language group was divided in two, Finnish would maybe be in
> the
> 'Fenno' part.
And Estonian (Finnish with no final syllables; see
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/essential.html).
> I wonder what languages would be Ugric...
Hungarian on the one hand, and the various Ugric languages
spoken on the Ob' on the other: Khanty, Mansi, etc.
"Finnish and Hungarian are about as similar as English and
Greek."
Question for anybody: where did the Swedes get the
term "Finne" anyway? What is its etymology?
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@...>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein