Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters.
From: | Michael Poxon <mike@...> |
Date: | Saturday, October 4, 2008, 12:28 |
It's important to realise that what we call "gender" in linguistics doesn't
of necessity relate to "sexual gender", although that doesn't mean this
isn't done. "Gender" is just a sort of cover-all term used to describe
grammars in which there are noun classes, which is probably a better term.
But since traditional linguistics began with the study of well-known IE
languages, especially the classical tongues, the term "gender" was used and
has sort of stuck ever since.
Mike
> It struck me that the Suraetuan rivers all have masculine endings, and I
> guess the Suraetuans must think of their waters as a kind of semen that
> fertilises the Earth. Maybe you people who have such wide repertoires of
> languages can tell me how common this is? Of course, many languages don't
> have a gender system. Of the languages I know anything about, at least
> German has a masculine word for river, but the majority of the others
> seem to be feminine. How are you dealing with this in your conlangs?
>
Reply