Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters.
From: | Michael Poxon <mike@...> |
Date: | Saturday, October 4, 2008, 14:52 |
Yes, German "Sun" is called feminine because it is "die Sonne" and
grammarians long ago decided that nouns which take "die" in the Nom.Sing.
would be called "feminine". But this is a very far cry from saying that
there is something inherently sexually-feminine about the Sun. In many
languages which have grammatical gender, sex-gender nouns are not mapped
100% on to these gender types, either. Of course in the sense of objects in
which one could invest some animism there may be in some cultures (and I
guess this is where you're coming from with your conlang!) a good case for
doing this. And a darn good thing too, I say, personally. Wish I'd have
included in my conlang!
Mike
>
> Of course there are many ways to classify nouns, but I think the gender
> systems in many cultures strongly suggest some relation to the genders of
> the deities or spirits inhabiting the physical objects. For example, the
> Germanic Sun is feminine with a masculine Moon counterpart, while further
> south it is often the other way around. After all, gender is a vital part
> of your spiritual world wherever you happen to locate yourself in space
> and time, at least if you're human.
>
> As for Suraetua I'm not completely sure if the classes are so gender-
> relevant after all. The only two obvious classes are the a-class, which
> is generally substantial, and the u-class, which is abstract. There are
> many nouns with other endings, mostly consonantal, but I think I possibly
> may find feminine e-endings hidden in the material if I explore it some
> more.
>
> LEF
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1706 - Release
> Date: 03/10/2008 18:17
>
>
Reply