Re: Critique needed for lessons
From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 24, 2006, 12:26 |
On 5/24/06, Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> wrote:
> As for the marking of English glosses I'd really prefer
> the standard convention of 'single quotes', simply 'cos
> to my eye at least the fixed width font doesn't stand
> out enough(3) -- I'm aware you can't tweak that with css,
> though.
Eh? Sure you can; it's called "generated content":
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/generate.html . (See, in particular, the
:before and :after pseudo-elements.) Heck, it even has special support
for using quotation marks of various descriptions!
> (Durst I suggest
I thought "durst" was 2sg. only; I would've expected "Dare I suggest" here.
> I really prefer Perl, and wish Perl could be as easily
> incorporated with HTML...
They are lots of ways to incorporate Perl in HTML; people love
reinventing certain wheels, and this is one of them. The Template
Toolkit may be one of the better ways. I think HTML::Mason is also
similar.
Cheers,
--
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
Reply