----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-François COLSON" <fa597525@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: Two questions about Esperanto
> I'm afraid you're right. My mistake comes from the inconsistency of
X-SAMPA:
>
> X-SAMPA /r/ = IPA /r/
> X-SAMPA /r\/ = IPA turned /r/
> X-SAMPA /R/ = IPA inverted /R/
> X-SAMPA /R\/ = IPA /R/
>
> But now I remember that all X-SAMPA lower-case vowels
I meant: "lowercase LETTERS". I sent that message at 23:21. I think it's
time to go to bed now...
> have the same value as
> in the IPA.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Bennett" <paul-bennett@...>
> To: <CONLANG@...>
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Two questions about Esperanto
>
>
> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:23:52 +0200, Jean-François COLSON
> > <fa597525@...> wrote:
> >
> > > piedmontese use r̂ (r with circumflex) for X-SAMPA [r] (IPA turned r)
>
> Correction: piedmontese use r̂ (r with circumflex) for X-SAMPA [r\] (IPA
> turned r)
>
>
> >
> > X-Sampa <r> is not IPA {turned-r}. X-Sampa <r> is IPA <r>, and IPA
> > {turned-r} is X-Sampa <r\>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Paul
> >
>