> Hi,
>
> As indicated in the header, this is a crossposting from the ZBB¹:
>
>> Ayeri has kind of a Fluid-S alignment with regards to which cases/
>> roles can act as S in transitive sentences. Up to now however
>> intransitive sentences have been restricted to S=A (≙ active
>> voice) and S=P (≙ passive voice), but looking at my conlang's
>> rather large pronoun table² I wonder whether the non-core-case
>> pronouns (in this case the columns after "Patient" although I
>> reckon the Benefactive/Dative as core case) could be used just as
>> well, and which outcome that might have both semantically and
>> syntactically. Are constructions like
>>
>> Vukyayā.
>> Vukya-yā
>> stare-1S.LOC
>>
>> or
>>
>> Narayasa.
>> Nara-yasa
>> talk/speak-3SM.CAU
>>
>> possible and sensible in other languages natural or constructed,
>> and if so, how would they be interpreted? Are there any papers or
>> Wikipedia articles on this topic (I bet there are)? I could
>> imagine the above example sentences to be used as eliptic answers
>> to questions, like "I did." in English, but certainly there are
>> other uses as well?
>
> Regards
> Carsten
>
> ¹)
http://www.spinnoff.com/zbb/viewtopic.php?t=29699
> ²)
http://benung.nfshost.com/index.php?
> go=grammar&action=grammar#pronanaph