Re: An Idea (Hopefully Non-offensive)
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, April 24, 2001, 23:26 |
In a message dated 4/24/01 11:18:56 AM, dbell@GRAYWIZARD.NET writes:
<< Well, what do I know. It's only taken me something like 30 years to create
a mere artlang. >>
Well, it took me three months to create my first, with a 100 page
lexicon. And if I can do it, anybody can do it.
<<It seems to me that the design of the lexicon (a posterior vs. a priori,
representation of languages in a posteriori auxlangs, at sight readability,
ease of learning, cultural neutrality etc.) is far more important in an
auxlang than in an artlang.>>
And I didn't intend these to be actual, full-fleshed languages, just
sketches, ideas--for the purposes of the contest, at least. Where they go
from there, and where they came from is the business of the author. I think
it's more than feasible to come up with the idea for an auxilliary language
in a month or two. But, such as my opinion. At least one other person
agrees with me, thus far. But, I'm at the beginning of the list...
-David