Re: THEORY: irregular conlangs
From: | Grandsire, C.A. <grandsir@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 21, 1999, 8:59 |
Nik Taylor wrote:
>
> So, they come from different IE roots. Nevertheless, *werg- and *wreg-
> are quite similar. One wonders if one was originally a variant of the
> other? To drive and to work are similar enough meanings ...
>
According to the 1-vowel theory, triconsonnantal roots in PIE come from
biconsonnanntal roots added with a suffix, the root and the suffix
having both a variable vowel. So *werg- and *wreg- would come from
**w.r-.g, with the dot being e, o or the zero-vowel, and *werg- would
come from this radical with e-degree on the root and zero-degree on the
suffix, whereas *wreg- would come from the same, but with zero-degree on
the root and e-degree on the suffix. As far as I know, there are many
such pairs in PIE, as it is reconstructed at least. Now, let's try and
find a meaning for this root **w.r and the suffix **-.g... <GGG>
--
Christophe Grandsire
Philips Research Laboratories -- Building WB 145
Prof. Holstlaan 4
5656 AA Eindhoven
The Netherlands
Phone: +31-40-27-45006
E-mail: grandsir@natlab.research.philips.com