Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Not phonetic but ___???

From:Roger Mills <rfmilly@...>
Date:Friday, April 16, 2004, 17:50
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 06:00:22PM +0300, Steg Belsky wrote: > > Now [&e] is what sounds Texan to me! > > Well, I'm in Georgia, which isn't too far off accentwise. :) Overall I > don't have much of a typical Southern accent, but I suspect that the > alteration of /&/ before voiced velars is indeed due to Southern > influence: "back" /b&k/ is [b&k], but "bag" /b&g/ is [b&eg]; "ban" /b&n/ > is [b&n], but "bang" /b&N/ is [b&eN].
That breaking/diphthongization/whatever of low front V before voiced velars is fairly common (tho the phonetics may differ) simply because the tongue is making a large movement. A major difference with the NYC vowel under discussion is that _that_ change began before dentals / t d n / -- and even at last reports, if not mistaken, is not yet categorical, i.e. doesn't affect _every_ such instance. > The vowel used in N'Yawk that i wrote as [e@] probably actually starts
> > in between [e] and [E], but that's definitely what it sounds like to > > me.
If I were going to imitate the Southern /&/, it would sound more or less like the nucleus in "Hyatt", [aj@], whereas the NYC bed/bad vowel is more [E_+j@] with a much more fronted and higher onset (you could transcribe it as "raised [E]" or "lowered [e]").
> > There are places out on Long(g) Island where all their vowels sound > > like either [e@] or [O@] :) >
The stereotypical examples are bed-bad and sure-shore.