Re: Random |mormon| :-) (was: my proposals for a philosophical language)
From: | Tristan <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Sunday, January 26, 2003, 11:50 |
Andreas Johansson wrote:
> Hm, (un-)happily, /mormon/ violates the phonotactics of all the
> conlangs of
> mine that have had any serious work on them - Tairezazh can't have
> non-final
> /m/, Steienzh can't have /o/ in a non-initial syllable, Altaii can't have
> the sequence /-rm-/, Kalini Sapak, Tersnuvu and Yargish don't even
> have /o/.
Etabnanni wouldn't be very happy with anything like /mormon/, but would
accept /"mo:1mo1n/ (1=normal pitch). As a borrowing, it'd be spelt
<M=OMON> (=O is long o), or natively something like <m=om'ona> or
<ev=om'one> (' accents the following letter). I can't say what, if
anything, it'd mean though.
Tristan
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?