Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Animacy of nouns

From:tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...>
Date:Friday, September 16, 2005, 1:09
--- In, Carsten Becker <naranoieati@B...>
> wrote: > [snip] > ... how do you know how animate a > noun is compared to another one? Are there rules (maybe only > rules of thumb), or is this completely up to the speaker, or > are there groups of "objects with high animateness", > "objects with an average animacy", "objects with a low > animacy", "inanimate objects", i.e. some kind of noun > classes for this? > [snip]
M.H. Klaiman's Chapter 3 of his "Grammatical Voice" talks about the grammar of control. In his opinion, "animachy" and "sympathy" and "agency-potential" are really about "control-potential". He does have rules, which he partially credits to someone else, I forget who. They are; (1) the participant's role must be crucial to the situation, and (2) the situation and the participant's role must be at least compatible with the possibility that the participant intended to have that situation and that role in it. He distinguishes "agenda control" from "outcome control". He also distinguishes conscious from unconscious control, and intentional from unintentional control. More later -- I'm getting kicked out. Tom H.C. in MI