Greco-glossa [was Re: Graiugenic languages (was: Re: Another phonological extreme...)]
From: | Jonathan Chang <zhang2323@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 24, 2000, 6:54 |
In a message dated 2000/07/24 06:08:33 AM:
>Muke Tever <realvinegar@...>
>>I got to thinking about what the
>>Romance languages would look like if they were Greek- instead of
>>Latin-based. (Any conlangs like that around? ...)
>
BPJ wrote:
>No, but it *is* a terriffic idea -- just what would be likely to happen in
>Lucus (my alternate timeline).
I like that idea a lot. Is Lucus a ConLang? More info, more please...
Being a Glosa* "outcast", I still like the Greek roots in much of the
international techno-scientific culture. The Greek roots _seem_ to have a
certain simple, integral "hardiness" that the Romance roots seemingly lack.
In almost any (written [Roman alphabet]) language where the international
techno-Greco roots are used, one can readibly recognize them. Makes one
wonder what that may imply for a Greco language group? and for an
Euro-civilization more Greco than Roman?
Anyone know more about the country in South East Asia - I think it's
Thailand, but I am not certain - that holds contests to see who can come up
with the best Sanskrit equivalents for techno-scientific words???
Z
* - one of those overly idealistic AuxLangs -