Re: Tonal inflection?
From: | Dana Nutter <deinx.nxtxr@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 23, 2008, 21:25 |
On 8/20/08, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> wrote:
> > I like the idea of tones for the comparatives. I could do that
> > too maybe though I'm leaning toward not having adjectives and
> > using stative verbs.
>
> Stative verbs would need to have some way of being compared,
> too. I don't know if languages with stative verbs and no separate
> class of adjectives typically have morphological comparatives
> or tend to use particles instead.
This is still just an experiment. I think maybe I'll try the
comparative tone. Maybe 55 for the superlative and 35 or 31 (more,
less) for comparatives.
> > This whole thing is just an idea I'm playing with, I don't
> > realistically expect the language to be something speakable,
> > especially with the huge number of distinctions I'm making. I'm
> > experimenting with the idea of economizing speech. I figure
> > tonal contours, roundedness and position alone will give me a
>
> Don't forget nasality and length (maybe three degrees of length
> as in Estonian?).
Yes, I have length and nasality included too.
> With about 15 basic vowels (not all the ones on the IPA chart, but a subset
> that should be comparatively easy to distinguish) times 2 for oral/nasal,
> times 3 for length, times ... hmm... let's modestly say 5 tones, you've
> got 450 syllable nuclei, not counting possible syllabic consonants
> (maybe 5 nasals and 3 lateral approximants, times 3 lengths and 5
> tones, another 120 nuclei).
I just need to decide on how many articulation points I want to use.
It will probably be at least 7. Figuring nasality, roundedness, and a
long-short distinction will give 56 possibilities, then multiply that
by the number of tonal contours which should be at least 7 (rising,
falling, high, low, medium, rising-falling, falling-rising)
> (Could the lateral approximants be nasalized and still sound
> distinct from regular nasal consonants in the corresponding POA?)
Good question, but while we're discussing this, it reminds me I could
also have prenasalized stops too.
Now for consonants. I could have maybe four articulations points:
labial, alveolar, velar, and uvular. Each will have a stops,
fricatives, implosives, clicks. Then figure in voicing, aspiration
and palatization just for a start. Given enough options, I could
pack a lot into a syllable.
Reply