Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ    Attic   

Re: Tonal inflection?

From:Dana Nutter <deinx.nxtxr@...>
Date:Saturday, August 23, 2008, 21:25
On 8/20/08, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> wrote:

> > I like the idea of tones for the comparatives. I could do that > > too maybe though I'm leaning toward not having adjectives and > > using stative verbs. > > Stative verbs would need to have some way of being compared, > too. I don't know if languages with stative verbs and no separate > class of adjectives typically have morphological comparatives > or tend to use particles instead.
This is still just an experiment. I think maybe I'll try the comparative tone. Maybe 55 for the superlative and 35 or 31 (more, less) for comparatives.
> > This whole thing is just an idea I'm playing with, I don't > > realistically expect the language to be something speakable, > > especially with the huge number of distinctions I'm making. I'm > > experimenting with the idea of economizing speech. I figure > > tonal contours, roundedness and position alone will give me a > > Don't forget nasality and length (maybe three degrees of length > as in Estonian?).
Yes, I have length and nasality included too.
> With about 15 basic vowels (not all the ones on the IPA chart, but a subset > that should be comparatively easy to distinguish) times 2 for oral/nasal, > times 3 for length, times ... hmm... let's modestly say 5 tones, you've > got 450 syllable nuclei, not counting possible syllabic consonants > (maybe 5 nasals and 3 lateral approximants, times 3 lengths and 5 > tones, another 120 nuclei).
I just need to decide on how many articulation points I want to use. It will probably be at least 7. Figuring nasality, roundedness, and a long-short distinction will give 56 possibilities, then multiply that by the number of tonal contours which should be at least 7 (rising, falling, high, low, medium, rising-falling, falling-rising)
> (Could the lateral approximants be nasalized and still sound > distinct from regular nasal consonants in the corresponding POA?)
Good question, but while we're discussing this, it reminds me I could also have prenasalized stops too. Now for consonants. I could have maybe four articulations points: labial, alveolar, velar, and uvular. Each will have a stops, fricatives, implosives, clicks. Then figure in voicing, aspiration and palatization just for a start. Given enough options, I could pack a lot into a syllable.

Reply

Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...>