Re: plural
From: | # 1 <salut_vous_autre@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 5, 2004, 21:49 |
Sally Caves wrote:
> I think French comes even closer, if only aurally! Le chat, les chats;
> l'implication, les implications; une technique, des techniques, etc.
My mother tongue is the frensh and I know that fact about the plural.
Usually, plurals are unaudible, because final "s" or "x" are not pronounced
so it is audible only with the other plural forms like "aux". it is why it
is more simple to learn to speak frensh than to write it, the flexions are
very present but only on writings, when we speak the plural is like the
singular and the first, second, and third person singular conjugaisons are
often the same.
But even unaudible, it is a plural change.
Nobody knows about a language (or conlang, because I'm probalby not the
first to have that idea) that uses to form the plural on the article?
Reply