Re: probably a bloody obvious question...
| From: | Padraic Brown <pbrown@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, August 21, 2000, 4:41 |
|---|
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>Mistakes like this are what prompted me to invent the "ambiguous" (now
>known as "epicene") gender in my conlang. If we were speaking my conlang,
>you could've just use "person[epicene] of many talents" and it would've
>worked either way. :-)
>
>Sorry, this is just a shameless self-plug for my conlang... :-P
>
Tis what the list is all about! I could do the same in Talarian,
as it has a word that means "(human) person of unspecified gender".
Could also do it in Kerno, though not with a word that means generic
person.
Padraic.
>
>T
>