>I assume "hn" si supposed to be vouceless
> > "n"... I wonder if it would get englished to [n&b]
> >or [h@n&b].
Oops! I don't know what happened to my transcription
here!I certainly meant "[naU]or [h@naU]". [&u] for
[aU] is an unsurprising error for me, going back to
before I'd really learnt the IPA, but 'b' for 'u'?
That's a bizarre typo!
And then it would be homophonous with "now", yes.
> Yeah, initial sonorants appear to devoice regularly,
> at least in hrossan
> dialects. Augray, a sorn, just says <nau>. I'd
> expect it'd be homophonous with
> "now" though.
>
> *Muke!
> --
>
http://www.frath.net/