Re: No Kayasanoda subordinate clauses
|From:||Matthew Kehrt <matrix14@...>|
|Date:||Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 15:37|
This sounds fascinating. Can you give us any more info on it?
Clint Jackson Baker wrote:
> They're rejected in favor of simply compounding verbs
> with that handy "hi" ("and"). You'll notice that word
> several times in my Babel text; it not only functions
> as "and/with", but also "bridges" phrases:
> hi suwata= while (suwata= suwa(time) + ta(at) )
> hi leso= because (leso= reason)
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!