Is it necessary to distinguish inclusiveness inpossessivemarkers?

Andreas Johansson wrote:
> Anyway, the rational argument for it being less important in 2nd is that it
> should usually be obvious from context who are included in the addressed
> party
Granted, context often clarifies, but not always.  There are contexts
where one can address a single person by "y'all/you guys/etc" thereby
specifying that the speaker is referring not just to the individual but
to the group he represents.

--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'.  Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42