Re: R: Comments required ... please : )
|From:||Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>|
|Date:||Friday, June 30, 2000, 8:42|
At 14:03 29/06/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Yes, I know about Euskara. I thought to use this possibility about two
>years ago, with one of my 10K conlang sketches, even before I ever
>heard of the Basque tongue. Indeed I do not like very much all those
>words with the same ending - Latin: illustribus hominibus, and so on...-.
>Probably I'll work this way: Erg. Abs. Gen. and Dat. with agreement --- Loc.
>and All, lately derived from locative postpositions with the Abs. case,
>without agreement (i.e. only the last word of a noun phrase takes the case
>HWAT DOST THOU THINK ABOUT YONDER THOUGHT?
I think that's a really nice idea! The diachronic explanation is very good,
and AFAIK, there are precedents in natlangs, even in I-E langs.
|Sela Jemufan Atlinan C.G.
"Reality is just another point of view."
homepage : http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
(ou : http://www.bde.espci.fr/homepages/Christophe.Grandsire/index.html)