Re: OT: Program[me] (Was Re: Conlang FAQ was Re: Grammatical tones)
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 24, 2002, 22:25 |
Quoting Tim May <butsuri@...>:
> bnathyuw writes:
>
> > what programme do you edit in ? good old notepad ( or
> > equiv ) or something flashier ? i tend to use
> > dreamweaver for speed and then clear up the glitches
> > in html afterwards
> >
>
> This is not particularly relevant to anything, but do you normally use
> the spelling "programme" to refer to software? I was taught (in
> primary school) "program" for that, and "programme" for broadcasts,
> itineraries and all other uses.
Isn't the spelling <program> originally entirely foreign to
Britain in the first place? I had been under the impression
that it was an import from America, and that its use as a
technical term in technology came about because the technology
in question was imported from the United States.
BTW: since we're going to be nitpicking ( 8P ), when posting
off-topic posts, use of the tag "CHAT:" is suggested since
subscribers not interested in off-topic posts can have those
filtered out. "OT:" is, unfortunately, not a tag the listserv
recognizes. (Of the other tags, "Grouplang", "NGL", "Theory"
and "Usage", the first two are essentially obsolete, while the
latter two are used quite often.)
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier
Dept. of Linguistics "Nihil magis praestandum est quam ne pecorum ritu
University of Chicago sequamur antecedentium gregem, pergentes non qua
1010 E. 59th Street eundum est, sed qua itur." -- Seneca
Chicago, IL 60637
Replies