Re: Unmarked definiteness
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Monday, August 23, 2004, 14:23 |
Andreas Johansson scripsit:
> Now, while it's not hard to see how this state of affairs came about -
> phonetic change simply ate the definite marker alive, but only snatched
> a leg from the indefinite one - but nonetheless seems remarkable;
> normally, we'd expect the indefinite to be the less marked form,
> wouldn't we? Is there any other languages which do the same?
Persian is a well-known case: -i marks indefiniteness, zero marks
definiteness.
--
Go, and never darken my towels again! John Cowan
--Rufus T. Firefly www.ccil.org/~cowan