Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law

From:Ph. D. <phil@...>
Date:Friday, September 14, 2007, 14:13
Tim Smith wrote:
> > I thought that there _was_ a case in which a US > federal court decided that you can't copyright a > language (con- or nat-). IIRC, this was in the > context of the Loglan vs. Lojban split, but I don't > remember the details. Can anyone either confirm > or deny this?
Just going on memory here, but I believe the case between Loglan and Lojban was over the right to use the name Loglan. It took several years, and by that time the Lojbanists had adopted the name Lojban, so their win was a moot point. Loglan was a registered trademark of the Loglan Institute, but the court reasoned that, as Loglan was a contraction of Logical Language, the name could not be trademarked. The Loglanists were pretty protective of their lan- guage. If you wrote a book in Loglan and wanted to publish it, your only option (according to their guidelines) was to submit it to the Loglan Institute. If they decided not to publish it, you were out of luck. You could not publish it on your own. If they did publish it, they would give you some royalty of their choosing. I believe this is what caused the break between the Loglanists and the Lojbanists. IANAL, and I'm just relating what I remember reading in past years, so caveat lector. --Ph. D.

Replies

Henrik Theiling <theiling@...>
Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
And Rosta <and.rosta@...>