Re: Mental masturbation: a correction
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, June 2, 1999, 23:28 |
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Sally Caves wrote:
>
> > As for how to say "mental masturbation" in one's conlang... the term
> > (as we have seen!) is just RIDDEN with negative connotations. It
> > means to indulge oneself in a worthless mental pursuit, which is how
> > Matt's psychiatrist meant it, however un-ironically.
>
> Just to set the record straight, the "mental masturbation" comment
> was not made by my psychiatrist. I do not have, and never have had,
> a psychiatrist or a therapist. The comment was made by an acquaintance
> of mine (the host-father in the family I stayed with while I was
> an exchange student in Sweden) who happens to be a child psychologist.
I *knew* I would get in trouble with that! When I read it I almost
posted a correction. I meant your psychiatrist *friend,* which is how
I've cast this phrase before. Sorry for the missing word.
Matt... re your apolgy and two bits; people have been apologizing
right and left, publically and privately. My response that you
quote above was to another thread entirely, started by Kristian,
and on the subject of self-reflexive words, and we should keep
it that way.
> Given the unfortunate direction this thread has taken, I suppose
> I should apologise for bringing up the incident in the first place.
Why? It was a perfectly interesting and timely remark. We were
talking about how non-conlangers sometimes put what we do down.
I guess we know how to do that to each other, don't we?
Thanks for all the information about "wh-in situ"; I found that
immensely helpful, and will respond to that once I've got my
head clear of all of this.
Sally