Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?

> "David J. Peterson" <dedalvs@...> wrote:
> To me, the fact that, as a joke, an English speaker can make
> up "blunk" for the past tense of "blink" says something important
> about language that theorists need to pay attention to.
Au contraire.  The past tense of "blink" is "blank": blink, blank,
blunk. You have made the same mistake as was made in the movie
title "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids." :-) I think we all know that English
is losing its strong verbs. What a shame! Strong pasts and participles
are going the way of "holp" and "holpen." But you're right it is fun
to invent strong verbs: think, thank, thunk; wink, wank, wunk; trim,
tram, trum; spell, spold, spold; fold, feld, feld. We could even have:
blink, blought, blought.

Charlie

Replies