Re: infix
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 22, 2001, 7:04 |
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:04:21 -0500 Roger Mills <romilly@...> writes:
> I'm curious: in all this discussion of Arabic, no one has mentioned
> /mu-/
> as in mujahid(in) 'holy warriors', < jihad 'holy war'; I assume it's
> also
> present in Muhammad, and perhaps Mubarak (leader of Egypt). Are
> these
> lexicalized, or is mu- still as productive as the others?
-
I assume, based on Hebrew, that the Arabic _mu-_ is part of the non-root
pattern of those words.
Example from Hebrew:
root: ShPL "low"
non-root: muCCaC "causative-passive present tense singular male"
word: mushpal "lowered"
Semitic triconsonantal morphology doesn't really work on infixes, it's
more of taking two patterns, one of the root and the other of everything
else, and meshing them together.
-Stephen (Steg)
"don't you just hate it when your character is smarter than you are?"