Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Ditransitivity (again!)

From:Costentin Cornomorus <elemtilas@...>
Date:Sunday, January 25, 2004, 22:01
--- Trebor Jung <treborjung@...> wrote:
> Merhaba! > > Is it possible to use a 'focus' case where > non-benefactives and non-prep.phrases (datives) > are put into, and benefactives are formed some > other way? For example: ''I gave him a gift = I > gave a gift to him' - is that reasonably > certainly dative?
It's "dative" because of the case of the noun (or pronoun) is "dative". Whether that dative is used with a preposition or is to be seen as benefactive or some other fancy thing is entirely up to you.
> And what are 'tritransitives'?
Add one to ditransitive! While I am no longer convinced that ditransitive means just the ability to take two objects, tritransitivity would take three objects. If you can think of a verb that requires a direct object an indirect object and some third object (a time, a place, a means, etc) then that would be tritransitive.
> How can I deal with em? (And > note that there's only one preposition, so does > that affect the benefactive's existence?)
Probably not. You can either use that one preposition for everything or introduce some other way of doing the work, like case endings. Padraic. ===== blaženi ništii duxom&#1100; &#283;ko t&#283;x&#1098; est&#1098; c&#283;sar&#1100;stvo nebes&#1100;skoe! -- Mt.5:3 -- Ill Bethisad -- <http://www.geocities.com/elemtilas/ill_bethisad> Come visit The World! -- <http://www.geocities.com/hawessos/> .

Reply

Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>