Re: palindrome to pluralize
| From: | andrew <hobbit@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 4:07 |
|---|
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Tas -> sat does not form a palindrome anywhere. That's just
> reversal. Tas -> tassat forms a palindrome. Duplication is just the
> mechanism ised to get a palindrome result. Other mechanisms are
> possible but less general.
>
Doesn't this depend on the form of writing? I seem to remember that
Chinese palindromes reverse the order of characters. So tas kin could
be tas kin kin tas in the plural. Just a suggestion,
--
Andrew Smith -- hobbit@griffler.co.nz --
http://hobbit.griffler.co.nz/homepage.html
"If you are gonna rebell you have to wear our uniform."
Reply