Re: Refining Minza
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 16, 2007, 12:42 |
On 16.7.2007 Herman Miller wrote:
> One thing I'm wondering is if it's unusual to have a
> retroflex series (which in this case I'm using /ň š ž/
> to represent) without one or more stops. Minza has
> affricates /tš/, /dž/, but these may be clusters.
Upper-class Lhasa Tibetan has (or had?) /t`s`/, /t`s`_h/,
/n`d`z`/, /s`/ but no plain retroflex stops, while lower-
class pronunciation has/had plain stops instead of the
affricates. I don't know how well the Chinese goverment
romanization with {ch, zh} reflects the prevalent modern
pronunciation, or if it's only using the closest thing
Pinyin got -- theoretically {th, dh} for [t`], [d`] might
make sense in a Pinyin context.
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Truth, Sir, is a cow which will give [skeptics] no
more milk, and so they are gone to milk the bull."
-- Sam. Johnson (no rel. ;)