Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement

From:Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>
Date:Thursday, December 13, 2007, 13:27
Oh, and "I, who is" sounds utterly wrong to me, for the record.  I can
much more readily accept "I, who are", though I would never say it..


On 12/13/07, Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
> "Ungrammatical" according to English textbooks, sure, but we're > talking about real live English as she be spoke. "I, who are" sounds > weird to me, but I can see where it would work, along the same lines > as "Aren't I?' > > Note that I misremembered my TKD earlier - the "as for noun, pronoun > is..." gloss only applies to the copula, which uses the personal > pronouns as verbs. So the question of noun subjects with 1st/2nd > perdon verb prefixes is not as clear-cut as I supposed. > > > On 12/13/07, Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@...> wrote: > > In the last episode, (On Thursday 13 December 2007 01:55:06), T. A. McLeay > > wrote: > > > David J. Peterson wrote: > > > > Mark: > > > > << > > > > Given the gloss in TKD for third-person nominal subjects ("As for the > > > > captain, he is on the bridge"), I see no reason why nouns should be > > > > disallowed for other persons. > > > > > > > > > > > > You know, there's kind of a similar phenomenon in English > > > > regarding relative clauses. Consider: > > > > > > > > I, who am a captain, prefer to wear briefs. > > > > ?*I, who is a captain, prefer to wear briefs. > > > > > > > > I'd say that's pretty straightforward, but then... > > > > > > > > ?!?*You can give the book to me, who am a captain. > > > > ?You can give the book to me, who is a captain. > > > > > > > > I have no explanation for any of this other than that English is > > > > broken. > > > > > > Apparently my English has fixed this because "I, who am a captain, ..." > > > is weird and at least questionable, if not outright wrong. Both "I, who > > > is a captain, ..." and "I, who are a captain, ..." are better, but > > > neither are good. > > > > > > > I have to disagree. "I, who is a captain", could surely only be used of a > > person whose name is "I", whilst "I, who are a captain" is just plain > > ungrammatical. Singular subject, singular complement, plural verb? Come > > on. "I, who am a captain"? Much better. > > > > Jeff. > > > > -- > > "Please understand that there are small > > European principalities devoted to debating > > Tcl vs. Perl as a tourist attraction." > > > > -- Cameron Laird > > > > > -- > Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> >
-- Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...>

Reply

Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@...>