Re: Most developed conlang
From: | Harold Ensle <heensle@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 19:03 |
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:47:32 -0400, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...>
wrote:
>gzb might not have fit your criteria a couple of years ago, but it
>probably does now. It depends on how you define "essential words",
>perhaps.
Yes, it fits the criteria, so add
GZB: Jim Henry: http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/gzb/gzb.htm
to the list.
>I think probably Tokana and Tepa, mentioned earlier in this
>thread, also fit your criteria re: completeness of grammar
>and documentation thereof, though I'm not sure how large
>their lexicons are.
I couldn't find the Tokana lexicon and Tepa had less than 1000,
that is probably why they weren't on the list.
Harold