Re: Most developed conlang
| From: | Harold Ensle <heensle@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, April 21, 2007, 19:54 |
|---|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:24:22 +0100, And Rosta <and.rosta@...>
wrote:
>Harold Ensle, On 18/04/2007 20:28:
>> amman-iar was not on the list because it was not "a priori".
>
>What is Amman-iar aposteriorily derived from? Sindarin? Surely not to any
great extent?
>
>--And.
Well...to as great as extent as can be determined. He only has
the letter A roots available, but it can be seen that he utilizes
Sindarin (or Quenya) roots at every opportunity. It is systematic.
(It couldn't be on the list anyway, since the lexicon is not
accessible on the internet.)
Harold