Re: Nauradi
From: | Alex Fink <000024@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 22:33 |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:46:37 -0500, Jim Henry <jimhenry1973@...> wrote:
>For my next conlang I've toyed with the idea of making
>attitudinality a mandatory inflectional category rather
>than an optional derivation method. ANADEW?
Not ANADEW but I did have one never-very-developed sketch that did that,
Vladician (after a high-school friend, and I forget what he did to merit
this particular feature in his language). Verbs had three degrees of
attitudinality, approbative/neutral/despective; nouns had two, lacking the
neutral degree. Moreover, in a great swath of the nouns and a few of the
verbs, attitudinality was suppletive; and positive and negative variants
didn't always line up one-to-one (e.g. I think that the approbative degree
had only a single word "creepy-crawly" to set alongside several despective
words for kinds of bugs and worms).
The only other place I've particularly seen that idea is as an offhand
suggestion of Justin B Rye, on http://www.xibalba.demon.co.uk/jbr/lingo.html .
Alex
Reply