Re: Separate verb conjugation paradigms in conlangs

Staving Trebor Jung:
>Was wondering... If your conlang divides up verbs into separate verb
>conjugational paradigms (as in Latin and Lithuanian), what sort of ways do
>you divide the verbs up? F'rex., is the didvision arbetrary or based on
>semantics? If the latter, what semantic criteria do you use?

The details aren't fully worked out yet, but some descendents of Magikimnaz
will have a separate paradigm for stative verbs.

Pete

Reply