Re: A New Conlang For Your Consideration
From: | Andrew Patterson <endipatterson@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 23, 2004, 14:02 |
Clearly you have developed your language from first principles, and you
have reduced the description to an algebraic type description.
I get the impression that the language seems quite unlike any human
language that I know of but I can see that it is based on fairly simple
principles. Clearly much of it does not fit into traditional grammatical
descriptions, but I get the feeling that there is nothing INHERANTLY
difficult about it. Could people learn to use it? Are you thinking of
writing a lessons section?