Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

En réponse à "H. S. Teoh" <hsteoh@...>:

>
> Strictly speaking, an author should not even think in terms of
> underlining
> or italicizing; but rather use \emph{} to indicate emphasis, and
> possibly
> define other logical markups (e.g. \booktitle{...},
> \journaltitle{...},
> etc.) rather than physical markups. It should be the editor's, not the
> author's, job to decide which font(s) should be used, and how emphases
> should be marked (either with bold or with italics or with whatever
> else).
>
Yep! But since many people will use Word processors that don't care much about
logical marking, I'll have to be a bit adaptable in that :)) .

> Since we have many authors and contributors, it might be helpful for
> the
> editor(s) to define a common set of logical markups that can be
> consistently used by all authors.
>
That's why I intend to make my journal package :)) . But I didn't have time to
start it yet :(( .

Christophe.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.