Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire wrote:

>En réponse à Tristan <zsau@...>:
>
>
>
>>>Underlining is easily done with \underline{} (underlined text in the
>>>
>>>
>>brackets).
>>
>>Umm... it is? I'd been living under the assumption than LaTeX (I
>>thought
>>that's what the _NSSITL_ said, although I could be wrong) didn't do
>>underlining.
>>
>>
>
>IIRC TeX doesn't. But LaTeX can do it (the command really works! :)) ). Not
>that it's advised though. But LaTeX can do a lot of things that are not
>specially advised as good typography.
>
It can? I must've misremembered the stuff I read about it. I thought it
was even harder to do things typographically bad with LaTeX than it was
with plain TeX. Apropos of that stuff, I've fixed up my style sheet and
will email it to you (personally) in a jiff.

Also, what is the editorial policy on spellings, punctuation, grammar
etc. British, American, Australian, something different? I like
Australian myself, it looks a lot nicer aesthetically (Z's have got to
be one of the ugliest letters). But that's probably just because I'm
used to it ;)

Tristan