Re: THEORY: Vowel shift (was: THEORY: Storage Vs. Computation)
From: | Andrew Smith <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Sunday, June 20, 1999, 3:08 |
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Raymond A. Brown wrote:
> As far as southern England is concerned, this is rather dated & not true of
> current English.
>
My material on sound change in that part of the world tends to be limited.
> I'm sure what sound you mean by {aeu}; if you mean [Eu] then that is hardly
> modern change.
[Eu] is probably more accurate.
>
> pronunciation general among the latter (and my pronunciation), it is true,
> is [&u] rather than [au].
>
Same with mine.
> I don't know quite what [ei] -> [aei] is but it looks remarkably like the
> triphthong devotees of Australian soaps operas know well from the habitual
> greeting "G'daigh!" :-)
>
That would be correct. G'day is a perfectly good salutation among
Australasians.
> Now Ozzie English is, I admit, showing some interesting vowel developments
> - at least as we hear it on the soap operas. But, unless the afficionados
> of 'Neighbours' and 'Home & Away' exert undue influence, I don't think
> we'll be following along those lines.
>
Australians tend to be much broader, New Zealand dialects more
conservative (more tongue-tied to our origins). I remember reading a
quote some years ago that NZ English showed trends that standard English
pronunciation could be expected to follow. I wondered then how the
logistics of that could work, so I will conclude that the dialects of
Hypernotian English are diverging from its Hyperborean origins,
international media trends notwithstanding.
- andrew.
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
Lo! thy dread empire, Chaos! is restored;
Light dies before thy uncreating word:
Thy hand, great Anarch! lets the curtain fall;
And Universal Darkness buries All.
- Alexander Pope, The Dunciad, Book IV.