> Scotto Hlad wrote:
> >The development of L3 continues. I have prepared a chart of latin compared
> >to Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and L3. It included the XSAMPA
> >pronounciation of L3.
> >
> >
http://www3.telus.net/scottoh/L3/numbers.htm
> >
> Well done. But some questions--
> 1. Apparently "c" is [ts] /__i, but [c] elsewhere (?), at least /__o (ouco
> '8'). Therefore, why is 100 "cint" given as [cint] not [tsint]? Typo?
>
> 2. The n in "cinci" '5' is pronounced. But apparently not in
> '50'..."ci_n_quinta" [tsi_kwinta] ? Another typo?
>
> 3. Every decade has "-inta", but not "70" "sitina"-- any reason?
>
> It's true, I have the mentality of a file-clerk, and yes, I know,
> consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds :-)))))))))))))))
>