Re: Verbs Outside of the Slavic
From: | Kevin Athey <kevindeanathey@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 29, 2005, 17:09 |
Thanks! This is useful.
>From: Elliott Lash <erelion12@...>
>
>Old Irish marks perfective and potential aspect by
>augmenting the verb with a derivational prefix. For
>most verbs it is "ro-" (or some phonologically
>conditioned variant). But, for some a range of other
>prefixes are used. Note also, that in the examples
>this "prefix" is often inserted between the root and
>another prefix which is in Old Irish grammar called a
>"preverb". I'll mark the preverb off from the root
>with a colon.
Is the preverb historically part of the verb proper, or it did it develop
from a series of bound morphemes?
<snip examples>
/ro/, /com/, and /ad/? Do you know the etymologies of these morphemes? It
is the etymological typology of the process I'm most interested in.
Also, is the potential ambiguous with the perfective, or is there a
different set of morphemes for forming the potential? All of your examples
were perfective.
>And a lot of others prefixes. But mostly it's "ro".
>Also, some verbs add some other prefix to a suppletive
>root to for the potential or the perfective.
Interesting, but not too surprising. Could you give an example or two of
that with etymological glosses?
>I also think that Georgian has a system like Russian
>or Old Irish, more like Russian probably. I can't
>think of many examples right now.
I'll have to check that out.
Athey
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
Reply