Re: Universals list?

Sai Emrys wrote:
> I've seen the Greenberg list.
>
> But AFAIK, it's considered outdated and methodologically unsound
> 'cause of the small sample size. I know there have been studies on
> this since then, but I don't know of any equally convenient form of
> them - i.e. some sort of list of tendencies / implications / etc.
>
> Anyone know of such a thing?
>
Try this: http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/proj/sprachbau.htm

More "universals ~tendencies" than you want to know about......:-))))