Re: USAGE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and
From: | Tristan <zsau@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 7, 2002, 11:54 |
Steg Belsky wrote:
>On Sat, 4 May 2002 18:46:32 +0100 And Rosta <a-rosta@...>
>writes:
>
>
>>>But anomalously so, like /RQT/ for "wrath". For me, /Q/ is one of
>>>
>>>
>>the most
>>
>>
>>>reliable markers of Not-My-Accent.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>I don't understand. Even if AusE has /Q/ in "wrath", it still has a
>>low
>>back vowel phoneme, and anyway, where is the anomaly. As for /rQT/,
>>that's
>>not an AusE preculiarity; rather, /raT/ is an AmE peculiarity.
>>(Hence
>>British newspapers calling _Portnoy's complaint_ _The gripes of
>>Roth_.)
>>--And.
>>
>>
>-
>
>Wait... so if "wrath" is /rQt/ in Australian English, how do they
>pronounce "wroth" there?
>
I do believe it's called a homonym. :)
Tristan