Re: OT: Need help with numeric bases
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 24, 2003, 22:12 |
Peter Clark wrote at 2003-02-24 15:48:45 (-0600)
> This is related to conculturing (Enamyn uses a base-8
> system), but on the other hand, it's of little general interest, so
> please respond off-list.
>
> Anyways, as I was saying, Enamyn uses a base-8 system,
> except that instead of being 0-7, it is 1-8 (there's no concept of
> zero). My problem has been finding some way of mathematically
> describing it. The standard method of using the remainder doesn't
> work: for instance, decimal 16 should be octal 18 rather than octal
> 20. Also, how does one go about converting the base of non-integer
> numbers?
Personally, I think number bases are sufficiently "linguistic" to
belong on conlang, and certainly there should be no problem as long as
there's an OT: in the subject line. It'll be more on-topic than
nearly 50% of what we've had in the past couple of weeks.
How exactly does your system work without zero? Most systems without
zero are tally systems rather than place-value systems. I think some
early systems (Babylonian? Egyptian) were place value and simply
ommitted zero, leading to ambiguity. But this doesn't seem to be
either. List the numbers from 1 to 16.
Replies