Re: Hutt
From: | Andrew Smith <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 10, 1999, 1:58 |
Is it a spelling error or does ootman have a plural form, ootmians. This
seems the only example of clear plural marking. Maybe Hutt does not have
consistant pluralisation.
There seem to be some use of doubling that may be adverbial or
interjective:
Chut-Chut! Never mind!
me wompity du pom pom I'd squash you right now
I wonder if the word _da_ is a auxilliary:
Hi chuba da nago? What do you want?
Tolpa da bunky dunko *Then you can go home
Cha skrunee da pat Don't count on it
The last example may mean that _da_ is also a preposition:
Oh da Hutt... As in Hutt...
Also the interjection _chess ko_ seems to mean 'careful!'
- andrew.
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@earthlight.co.nz
Lo! thy dread empire, Chaos! is restored;
Light dies before thy uncreating word:
Thy hand, great Anarch! lets the curtain fall;
And Universal Darkness buries All.
- Alexander Pope, The Dunciad, Book IV.