Re: OT: Mormons (was Re: Survey)
From: | Sarah Marie Parker-Allen <lloannna@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, March 18, 2003, 23:23 |
I've seen it several ways, honestly. I like my way because it's easy to
confuse with "polygamy"...
And... I'm not surprised. After all, the reasons that men were hunter-types
had a lot more to do with physical attributes (and their ill-suitedness to
actually bearing children) than notions of social liberation.
Sarah Marie Parker-Allen
lloannna@surfside.net
http://www.geocities.com/lloannna.geo
http://lloannna.blogspot.com
"Being captured by the Evil Overlord is one way to learn his secret plans,
but are innumerable other ways that are better, and they will be tried
first." -- Rules for the Hero
> -----Original Message-----
> I thoght it was spelt "polygyny", with triple "y"s? That's what
> one'd expect
> from the Greek, at any rate.
>
> Noteworthily, in both
> cases gender roles seems to be quite traditionalistic; men as the primary
> hunters and warriors, women as the primary child-rearers and
> food-preparers
> (good ammo in discussions with feminists, incidentially). In the
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by SURFSIDE INTERNET]
Reply