News about Futurese
From: | Javier Barrio <uaxuctum@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 10, 2002, 13:27 |
Hello,
I've been thinking about it and finally I've
introduced the
following changes to the phonology:
- Vowel <y> /@/ disappears as a phoneme
- The palatal nasal consonant is introduced instead
- All syllables will now conform to a strict CV
phonetic pattern
- "Final" consonants will be appended a non-phonemic
(short) schwa
The phoneme chart now looks as this:
CONSONANTS (voiceless/voiced;lateral,rhotic;*mildly
aspirated)
------------------------------------------------------------
(21) | Labial | Dental | Palatal |
Guttural |
| Blb. | Lbd.| Dnt. | Alv. |Post.| Pal.| Lbv.
| Vel. | Glt. |
--------------------------------------------------------------------|
Plos. | P*/B . | T*/D . | . |
. K*/G . |
.......|............|..............|...........|....................|
Affr. | . | . | C/X . |
. . |
.......|............|..............|...........|....................|
Fric. | . F/V | . S/Z | . |
. . H/ |
--------------------------------------------------------------------|
Nasal | /M . | /N . | . /Y |
. /Q . |
.......|............|..............|...........|....................|
Liquid | . | . /L,/R | . |
. . |
.......|............|..............|...........|....................|
Approx.| . | . | . /J | /W
. . |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
VOWELS (all voiced; * rounded)
-------------------------------
(5) | Front | Central | Back |
-------------------------------------|
Close | I . . U* |
.....................................|
Middle | E . . O* |
.....................................|
Open | . A . |
--------------------------------------
(Blb. bilabial; Lbd. labiodental; Dnt. dental; Alv.
alveolar;
Post. postalveolar; Pal. palatal; Lbv. labiovelar;
Vel. velar;
Glt. glottal; Plos. plosive [stop]; Affr. affricate;
Fric.
fricative; Approx. approximant [semivowel])
As you can see, the language uses now only the
following
131 spoken syllables (a number around the one used by
Hawaiian and far less from that of Japanese), all of
them
belonging strictly to the CV kind:
?i p_hi bi fi vi mi t_hi di si zi ni
li ri tSi dZi ñi ji k_hi gi hi Ni wi
?E p_hE bE fE vE mE t_hE dE sE zE nE
lE rE tSE dZE ñE jE k_hE gE hE NE wE
?a p_ha ba fa va ma t_ha da sa za na
la ra tSa dZa ña ja k_ha ga ha Na wa
?O p_hO bO fO vO mO t_hO dO sO zO nO
lO rO tSO dZO ñO jO k_hO gO hO NO wO
?u p_hu bu fu vu mu t_hu du su zu nu
lu ru tSu dZu ñu ju k_hu gu hu Nu wu
p_h@ b@ f@ v@ m@ t_h@ d@ s@ z@ n@ l@
r@ tS@ dZ@ ñ@ j@ k_h@ g@ h@ N@ w@
The short schwa sound may be dropped in running
speech,
but only as long as it doesn't cause the remaining
consonant to be altered by the following one.
Some sample sentences:
- Go i da bal je du yam me na kok.
['gÓ: | ?i da 'bá:l@_( | jE du 'ñá:m@_( mE na
,k_hÒ:k_h@_(]
{me}{is}{being at}{speech}{when at the state
of}{inflicting}
{eating}{upon}{a}{gallinaceous fowl}
"I spoke while eating a cock."
- Ka e qor be ta hin?
{is it that}{there is}{disturbance}{by}{that
one}{equine animal}
['ká: ?E 'NÓ:r@_( | bE t_ha ,hì:n@_(]
"Does that horse disturb?"
Note that each translation given is just one of
several
possibilities, because some details are left
unspecified
in the original sentences. I chose maybe the most
probable
English equivalents.
The details about suprasegmental features (note that I
used
":" for half-long, "_(" for very short, and "," for
secondary
stress), are my suggestion for achieving what I find
as a
"melodious" spoken result.
Comments, doubts, suggestions, complaints? :-)
Cheers,
Javier
P.D. I sincerely hope the discussion not to become
a flame war this time. :-)
_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis!
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es